Kelbick or Haske Defense
10/25/2014 20:30
Can't afford both before our practices start. Any recommendations?
10/26/2014 11:46
That all depends on your preference I think.
Personally, I do not use match up zone. I run all man to man. However, if I decided I was going to use a match up, I would run Kelbick's because it is based on man principles and it's better than anything else I have personally seen. The other match ups I have seen were too complicated and the complication didn't add any value.
So for me, it is Haske. And I actually will be using a little bit of his defense to compliment and extend our man to man.
So I think you just need to decide if you want to use the match up in the half court or man to man in the half court. If you want to use match up, go with Kelbick. If you want to go man in half court, go with Haske.
If you have specific questions about those half court defenses, let us know.
Personally, I do not use match up zone. I run all man to man. However, if I decided I was going to use a match up, I would run Kelbick's because it is based on man principles and it's better than anything else I have personally seen. The other match ups I have seen were too complicated and the complication didn't add any value.
So for me, it is Haske. And I actually will be using a little bit of his defense to compliment and extend our man to man.
So I think you just need to decide if you want to use the match up in the half court or man to man in the half court. If you want to use match up, go with Kelbick. If you want to go man in half court, go with Haske.
If you have specific questions about those half court defenses, let us know.
10/26/2014 23:14
Thanks sir!


Facebook (145k Followers)
YouTube (152k Subscribers)
Twitter (33k Followers)
Q&A Forum
Podcasts